E Ride Pro SS 3.0 VS Tork Pro-Sport
Quick Verdict
The Rundown
The SS 3.0 is $101 less at $4,999 with the longest range in the lineup (up to 100 miles). The Tork Pro-Sport hits 65 mph with 16.8kW and weighs just 150 lbs. Both use belt drive and include the same Send Bikes warranty. The SS 3.0 is the value play. The Tork is the agile all-rounder.
Why Choose
E Ride Pro SS 3.0
Riders who want the lowest entry price and maximum range per charge in the Send Bikes lineup.
- $4,999 — lowest price in the Send Bikes lineup
- Up to 100 miles of range per charge
- 3600Wh battery capacity
- Same belt drive and warranty as Tork
- Strong 15.8kW for the price point
Why Choose
Tork Pro-Sport
Riders who want a lighter, faster bike with more peak power and quicker handling.
- 65 mph top speed vs 62 mph
- 16.8kW peak power — 6% more than SS 3.0
- 150 lbs — 17 lbs lighter than SS 3.0
- Quicker handling on technical terrain
- Belt drive with same warranty coverage
Head to Head
Spec-by-Spec Comparison
| Spec | E Ride Pro SS 3.0 | Tork Pro-Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $4,999 | $5,100 |
| Top Speed | 62 mph | 65 mph |
| Peak Power | 15.8 kW | 16.8 kW |
| Range | 64–100 mi | 70–105 mi |
| Weight | 167 lbs | 150 lbs |
| Battery | 3600 Wh | 3240 Wh |
| Charge Time | 3.5 hrs (20-90%) | 3.5 hrs (20-90%) |
| Drivetrain | Belt Drive | Integrated Motor-Gearbox |
Price
E Ride Pro SS 3.0
$4,999
Tork Pro-Sport
$5,100
Top Speed
E Ride Pro SS 3.0
62 mph
Tork Pro-Sport
65 mph
Peak Power
E Ride Pro SS 3.0
15.8 kW
Tork Pro-Sport
16.8 kW
Range
E Ride Pro SS 3.0
64–100 mi
Tork Pro-Sport
70–105 mi
Weight
E Ride Pro SS 3.0
167 lbs
Tork Pro-Sport
150 lbs
Battery
E Ride Pro SS 3.0
3600 Wh
Tork Pro-Sport
3240 Wh
Charge Time
E Ride Pro SS 3.0
3.5 hrs (20-90%)
Tork Pro-Sport
3.5 hrs (20-90%)
Drivetrain
E Ride Pro SS 3.0
Belt Drive
Tork Pro-Sport
Integrated Motor-Gearbox
Deep Dive
Key Differences
Power & Speed
E Ride Pro SS 3.0
15.8kW peak, 62 mph top speed
Tork Pro-Sport
16.8kW peak, 65 mph top speed
The Tork Pro-Sport has a 6% power edge and 3 mph more top speed. The difference is noticeable at top end but marginal for most riding. Both bikes accelerate hard and handle aggressive terrain. The Tork pulls slightly harder above 55 mph.
Range & Battery
E Ride Pro SS 3.0
64-100 miles on 3600Wh pack
Tork Pro-Sport
60-90 miles per charge
The SS 3.0 stretches 10 miles further at best case — 100 vs 90 miles. Both bikes have excellent range for full-day riding. The SS 3.0's edge comes from its slightly lower power draw. For riders who push range limits, the SS 3.0 has a small but meaningful advantage.
Weight & Handling
E Ride Pro SS 3.0
167 lbs with proven stability
Tork Pro-Sport
150 lbs — lightest in the Send Bikes lineup
The Tork Pro-Sport is 17 lbs lighter, making it the most agile bike in the Send Bikes lineup. That's noticeable on tight single-track, when loading into a truck, and for smaller riders. The SS 3.0 is stable at speed. The Tork is nimble in turns.
Value & Support
E Ride Pro SS 3.0
$4,999 — $101 less than Tork
Tork Pro-Sport
$5,100 — more speed and less weight for $101 more
The price gap is just $101. Both include belt drive, the same Send Bikes warranty, and Terrace Finance options. This comes down to whether you value range and savings (SS 3.0) or speed and lightness (Tork). Neither is a wrong choice.
The Bottom Line
Our Verdict: It Depends
Two excellent bikes from the same shop with a $101 price gap. The right choice depends entirely on whether you prioritize range and value or speed and agility.
E Ride Pro SS 3.0
Get the SS 3.0 if range is king and you want to save $101. It's the best value entry point to the Send Bikes lineup.
Tork Pro-Sport
Get the Tork Pro-Sport if you want the lightest, fastest mid-range option with 3 more mph and 17 fewer pounds.
Service & Warranty
Both models ship from Send Bikes with identical dealer support, factory warranty, and service through Central Georgia Powersports.
Financing & Ownership
Monthly payments differ by roughly $2-3 depending on term length. Both qualify for Terrace Finance. Since warranty, support, and drivetrain are identical, the decision is purely about riding preferences.